PRP vs. Cortisone Injections: What's the Difference and Which Is Better?

Hands-on examination of a patient's leg

The short answer. Cortisone and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are both injected into painful joints and tendons, but they work in different ways. Cortisone calms inflammation and usually starts working within about a week1,2. PRP is a concentrate of your own platelets, and it can take several weeks before you notice a benefit3. In trials that compare the two head to head, cortisone tends to do as well or better in the first month, while PRP has often come out ahead at three to six months4,5,6,7. The answer depends on the condition.

How does a cortisone shot work?

Cortisone is a corticosteroid, a manufactured drug that closely resembles cortisol, a hormone your adrenal glands make. It temporarily turns down the immune system's activity in the area where it is injected, which reduces pain and inflammation1. The shot can go into a joint, a bursa (a fluid-filled cushion near a joint) or the area next to a tendon, and it is usually given together with a local anesthetic2.

Providers use cortisone for arthritis, tendinitis, bursitis, tennis elbow, carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger finger, among other conditions1. Some people need only one shot after a temporary injury, while others with a long-term condition need repeat injections1.

How does PRP work?

Blood is mostly liquid plasma, with red cells, white cells and platelets suspended in it. Platelets are best known for clotting, but they also contain hundreds of proteins called growth factors that are important in healing3. PRP is plasma with a platelet concentration 5 to 10 times higher than normal blood. To make it, blood is drawn and spun in a centrifuge to separate and concentrate the platelets, which are then injected into the injured area3.

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) is candid that it is not exactly clear how PRP works; laboratory studies suggest the higher concentration of growth factors may speed healing3. Results can depend on the area treated, your overall health, whether the problem is new or long-standing, and how the PRP was prepared3.

How fast does each one work, and how long does relief last?

Cortisone. The local anesthetic mixed into the shot can ease pain for the first few hours. When it wears off, the old pain may come back for several days, and the steroid itself usually starts working 5 to 7 days after the injection2. Cleveland Clinic advises calling your provider if you do not feel better after 10 days1. Relief usually lasts from a few weeks to a few months, and with a long-term condition, symptoms can gradually return1.

PRP. Pain at the injection site may actually increase for the first week or two, and it may be several weeks before you feel a benefit3. For mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis, some studies have shown results lasting up to two years3.

Research on cortisone fits that timing. A review of 41 randomized trials of tendon injections found that cortisone reduced pain in the short term compared with other treatments8.

PRP vs cortisone for knee arthritis

AAOS notes that more and more research shows PRP is effective for mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis3. In trials that compared it with cortisone, PRP has done better after the first few months. A 2021 meta-analysis of eight studies and 648 patients found PRP was better than cortisone at reducing pain and stiffness and improving function at 3, 6 and 9 months. Three PRP injections given about a week apart did better than a single injection over 12 months4. A 2025 network meta-analysis of 37 randomized trials, all with at least a year of follow-up, ranked PRP combined with hyaluronic acid first and PRP alone second for pain and function at one year9.

At our practice, physical therapy and viscosupplementation come before orthobiologics such as PRP in the order of care. See knee conditions for how that works in practice.

Tennis elbow, plantar fasciitis and the shoulder

Outside the knee, the pooled trials show a similar shape: cortisone tends to match or beat PRP early, and PRP tends to lead later.

ConditionTrials pooledWhat the review found
Tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis)13 randomized studiesCortisone ahead at 1 month; PRP ahead at 3 and 6 months [5]
Plantar fasciitis (heel pain)24 randomized trials, 1,653 peopleCortisone similar at 1 month; PRP better for pain at 3 and 6 months, and for foot function at 3, 6 and 12 months [6]
Rotator cuff tendinopathy or partial tears10 randomized trials, 591 peopleCortisone similar at 3 to 6 weeks and 3 months; PRP modestly better for pain and function at 6 months [7]

Tennis elbow. In a double-blind trial of 100 patients, 73% of the PRP group and 49% of the cortisone group met the definition of success at one year, based on pain scores. The cortisone group did better at first, while the PRP group kept improving10. At two years, arm function in the PRP group had improved significantly11. A second meta-analysis, of 11 randomized trials and 730 patients, found the same split: cortisone better in the first two months, PRP better at six months and beyond12.

Plantar fasciitis. A separate 2025 review of 13 trials and 901 people found better pain scores with PRP in the medium term13.

Shoulder. In the 2026 review of 10 trials, PRP showed clearer benefits at six months, with better shoulder function and pain scores than cortisone, and it was associated with fewer adverse events7. The authors suggested PRP may be a more durable option for rotator cuff tendinopathy7.

Can repeated cortisone shots damage the joint?

This is a real reason to think carefully about repeat steroid injections into the knee.

A 2019 review in *Radiology* described four adverse joint findings seen in hips and knees after steroid injections: faster progression of osteoarthritis, subchondral insufficiency fracture (a fracture in the bone just beneath the cartilage), complications of osteonecrosis, and rapid joint destruction including bone loss. The authors said more research is needed to identify which patients are at risk14.

Cleveland Clinic advises waiting at least three months between shots and says most people should not have more than three in a year. People who receive many rounds may also have a higher risk of osteoporosis1. Tendon rupture is possible but uncommon: in trials that reported side effects, 1 of 991 people who received cortisone (0.1%) had a tendon rupture8.

Side effects of each

Cortisone. The most common side effects are pain at the injection site, a temporary increase in swelling, bruising, a short-term rise in blood sugar, and redness, discoloration or lightening of the skin where the needle went in1. People with diabetes should check their blood sugar more often for about five days afterward1. Rarely, the shot can cause infection, high blood pressure or fluid retention1, and MedlinePlus also lists allergic reaction, bleeding into the joint or tendon, and nerve damage2.

PRP. AAOS describes the risks as minimal. The main one is increased pain at the injection site. The rates of infection, tissue damage and nerve injury appear similar to those of cortisone injections3.

A large review of side effects after knee injections pooled 559 studies covering 76,061 patients. It found at least one side effect in 11.0% of people after cortisone and 8.7% after PRP, with severe side effects in 1.1% and 0.3%15.

How much does PRP cost compared with cortisone?

PRP is usually paid out of pocket. AAOS notes that few insurance plans provide even partial reimbursement3, and a 2024 national study states that PRP is typically not covered by insurance16.

National figures (these are not our practice's prices):

  • Of 100 top-ranked US orthopedic hospitals contacted by phone, 87 offered PRP for knee osteoarthritis. Quoted prices ranged from $350 to $2,815 per injection, with a median of $80016.
  • An earlier survey of 153 US clinics found a mean price of $714 for a single PRP injection in one knee17.

We did not find a published national price for a cortisone shot, so none is quoted here. Coverage for either injection depends on your plan.

How to decide

  • If you need relief soon, for a flare or a specific event, cortisone usually works within about a week1,2 and tends to match or beat PRP in the first month5,6,7. In Dr. Scheinberg's view, corticosteroid is fast and useful for a flare but temporary.
  • If the pain keeps coming back, PRP has more often come out ahead from about three to six months on4,5,6,7.
  • If you have already had several cortisone shots in a knee, the joint findings seen after repeated steroid injections are worth discussing14.
  • If you have diabetes, ask about the short-term rise in blood sugar after a steroid shot1,2.

Not every patient is a candidate for orthobiologics, and a proper orthopedic evaluation is essential before choosing either injection. Learn more about PRP at our practice.

If you are in the Santa Barbara area, Dr. Scheinberg can examine the joint, review any imaging and talk through which option fits your situation. Call (805) 682-1394.

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to the questions patients ask most.

Have a question about your own situation?

Call (805) 682-1394
Is PRP better than a cortisone shot?

It depends on the condition and the time frame. In pooled trials, cortisone tends to match or beat PRP in the first month, and PRP has often done better at three to six months4,5,6,7. In one double-blind tennis elbow trial, 73% of the PRP group and 49% of the cortisone group met the definition of success at one year10.

How long does a cortisone shot last?

Usually a few weeks to a few months. The steroid typically starts working 5 to 7 days after the injection1,2.

How long does PRP take to work?

It may be several weeks before you feel a benefit, and the injection site can be more sore for the first week or two3.

How many cortisone shots can you get in a year?

Cleveland Clinic advises waiting at least three months between shots and says most people should not have more than three in a year1.

Is PRP covered by insurance?

Usually not; few plans provide even partial reimbursement3. Nationally, top US orthopedic hospitals quoted $350 to $2,815 per injection, with a median of $80016.

References

  1. 1. Cleveland Clinic. Cortisone shots (steroid injections): benefits and side effects. Cleveland Clinic Health Library, medically reviewed, last updated Feb 5, 2024. my.clevelandclinic.org
  2. 2. Ma CB (updated by). Steroid injections: tendon, bursa, joint. MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia, US National Library of Medicine, review date Jun 17, 2024. medlineplus.gov
  3. 3. Alaia MJ, Kelly FB (contributors). Platelet-rich plasma (PRP). OrthoInfo, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. orthoinfo.org
  4. 4. McLarnon M, Heron N. Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections versus intra-articular corticosteroid injections for symptomatic management of knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):550. PubMed
  5. 5. Hohmann E, Tetsworth K, Glatt V. Corticosteroid injections for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis are superior to platelet-rich plasma at 1 month but platelet-rich plasma is more effective at 6 months: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of level 1 and 2 studies. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023;32(9):1770-1783. PubMed
  6. 6. Zuo A, Gao C, Jia Q, et al. Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroids in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025;104(7):613-621. PubMed
  7. 7. Yuwarungsikul C, Phisalaphong K, Thamrongskulsiri N, et al. Platelet-rich plasma provides modest but durable functional benefit over corticosteroid for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2026;34(8):2937-2950. PubMed
  8. 8. Coombes BK, Bisset L, Vicenzino B. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroid injections and other injections for management of tendinopathy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9754):1751-1767. PubMed
  9. 9. Gupta N, Khatri K, Lakhani A, et al. Long-term effectiveness of intra-articular injectables in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20(1):227. PubMed
  10. 10. Peerbooms JC, Sluimer J, Bruijn DJ, Gosens T. Positive effect of an autologous platelet concentrate in lateral epicondylitis in a double-blind randomized controlled trial: platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection with a 1-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(2):255-262. PubMed
  11. 11. Gosens T, Peerbooms JC, van Laar W, den Oudsten BL. Ongoing positive effect of platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection in lateral epicondylitis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(6):1200-1208. PubMed
  12. 12. Xu Y, Li T, Wang L, et al. Platelet-rich plasma has better results for long-term functional improvement and pain relief for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52(10):2646-2656. PubMed
  13. 13. Rayo-Martín R, Rayo-Rosado R, Rayo-Pérez AM, et al. Comparison of PRP injections versus corticosteroid injections in plantar fasciitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Spec. 2025 (online ahead of print). doi:10.1177/19386400251363002. PubMed
  14. 14. Kompel AJ, Roemer FW, Murakami AM, et al. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections in the hip and knee: perhaps not as safe as we thought? Radiology. 2019;293(3):656-663. PubMed
  15. 15. Bensa A, Piano A, Fumagalli GA, et al. Safety profile comparison of intra-articular corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, and cell-based injections for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis by the ESSKA Orthobiologics Initiative. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 (online ahead of print). doi:10.1002/ksa.70230. PubMed
  16. 16. Tiao J, Wang K, Herrera M, et al. There is wide variation in platelet-rich plasma injection pricing: a United States nationwide study of top orthopaedic hospitals. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024;482(4):675-684. PubMed
  17. 17. Piuzzi NS, Ng M, Kantor A, et al. What is the price and claimed efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injections for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in the United States? J Knee Surg. 2019;32(9):879-885. PubMed

Reviewed by Dr. Richard Scheinberg, MD, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon in Santa Barbara with 40 years of surgical experience.